Responding to BIA Hack-ala's spamming
اعوذ بِالله مِن همزات الهبائيين اللعين
هو المستعان الإله الفتّاح النّصّار القيهر
بِاسمائك كلّها اللهمّ انّي أسألك بِسبحات الجلال حمدك مِن طلعات الهياكل التّوحيد و مظاهر الآثار البيان تكبيرك يا الله
Recently the Baha'i Internet Agency via its sockpuppet Hack-ala spammed the sub-reddits exbahai and BAYANI with the following:
"Also, two passages quoting academic texts from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azali are illuminating on this issue and reject a number of Nima's (aka Wahid's) false assertions: "Taqiyya Taqiya ("dissimulation") was practiced by some Bábís. It was justified by some as a response to the often violent oppression the community faced. However, prominent Bábí leaders never encouraged individuals to practice it"
First, as the history of the entry itself shows, the Wikipedia “Azali entry” is a propaganda entry controlled by the Baha’i Internet Agency itself who has systematically resisted any attempts to source any other narratives but official Baha’i ones on the subject while banning anyone who has tried to do so. In other words, that entry on Wikipedia is a controlled Baha’i narrative, biased, and so without a shred of objectivity. Second, the false assertion belongs to Hack-ala himself and his creed, particularly due to the fact that the Bāb not only encouraged the exercise of the ‘discipline of the arcane’ (taqīya) but verbatim echoed the words of the Imāms (ع) repeatedly who said, “the discipline of the arcane is half of religion,” “he who forsakes the discipline of the arcane is like he who has forsaken prayer,” “the discipline of the arcane is the believer’s shield and were it not for the discipline of the arcane God would not be properly worshiped,” see especially Etan Kohlberg, “Taqīya in Shiʿi Theology and Religion,” in Kippenberg and Stroumsa (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1995): 345-80. Since Hack-ala cannot read a single letter of Arabic, nor has any access to original texts, sources and manuscripts, his reliance on such demonstrably false assertions are based on manifestly flawed and self-serving Baha’i interpretations.
Be that as it may, third, the assertion by Hack-ala is particularly rich given that Bahāʾullāh himself was an advocate of taqīya which he gratuitously rebranded with the word* “ḥik*ma” (wisdom). So much so, that Baha’i propagandist Susan S. Maneck made the following observation in a published piece on the subject:
“In many cases hikmat calls for the apparent suspension of a Bahá'í principle in order to ensure the protection of the Faith.”
Or, in other words, Baha’is may lie under any circumstance in order to ensure the protection of their organizational cohesiveness, which perforce reinforces that Hack-ala’s protestations claiming he is not a member of the BIA are actually a species of the same: LIES.
"The Azali Babis and in particular Mirza Aqa Khan Kirmani and Shaykh Ahmad Ruhi showed little hesitation in alteration and falsification of Babi teachings and history in their works.”
Of course, Hack-ala has no shred of evidence for this loaded claim and is merely relying on the smears of other Baha’i propagandists who themselves have no evidence for such claims nor have ever demonstrated what alterations or falsifications of specifically Bābī teachings by the aforementioned they are talking about.
اعوذ بِالله مِن همزات الشياطين الهبائيين اللعين
The Baha'i Internet Agency via its sockpuppet Hack-ala spammed the sub-reddit exbahai once again, with the following:
“I cited to a link to published sources that survived challenges on Wikipedia as support for what so said”
To which is the response:
The following is a manifesto against Wikipedia - against its pretensions to being encyclopedic; against its false claims of openness; against its representation of a democratic access to, and democratic enunciation of, knowledge; against its institutionalized falsification of facts; against its sordid attempts to monopolize knowledge and rewrite history by blanking out parts of our collective memory and replacing them with imprimaturs. Yes, those are all aspects of the cyberbureaucratic fraud that Wikipedia is committing wholesale upon knowledge. The fraud that consists of producing false knowledge on an encyclopedic scale. Now, that's notable about Wikipedia, if nothing else is.
“Of course, I have never been in contact with or associated with the B.I.A.”
In many cases hikmat calls for the apparent suspension of a Bahá'í principle in order to ensure the protection of the Faith.
Or, in other words, Baha’is may lie under any circumstance in order to ensure the protection of their organizational cohesiveness.
“I had a person who claimed credibly to be a Bayani confirm the information about the numbers of Bayani's currently”
Lie. No such person has ever made such representations to Mark Hack-ala aka DavidbinOwen aka Sockpuppet of the Baha'i Internet Agency https://www.scribd.com/document/235458904/Baha-i-Internet-Agency-SourceWatch
و لعنة الله على الشياطين الهبائيين في كلّ حين فسيعلم الذين الهبائيون اي منقلب ينقلبون